<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Christopher S. Penn's Awaken Your Superhero - Latest Comments in Identifying and nuking Twitter spammers</title><link>http://christopherspenn.disqus.com/</link><description>Christopher S. Penn's Awaken Your Superhero</description><atom:link href="https://christopherspenn.disqus.com/identifying_and_nuking_twitter_spammers/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:57:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Identifying and nuking Twitter spammers</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/04/identifying-and-nuking-twitter-spammers/#comment-8686036</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I never use Yahoo Pipes, this gives me a great excuse.  Thanks Chris-this was a great post.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cabezas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Identifying and nuking Twitter spammers</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/04/identifying-and-nuking-twitter-spammers/#comment-8682118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's trickier - check out the API wiki - linked at the bottom of every Twitter page.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher S. Penn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:17:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Identifying and nuking Twitter spammers</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/04/identifying-and-nuking-twitter-spammers/#comment-8682113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You don't -have- to use those terms - those I just illustrated for example. I'd personally go the Google Reader route so that you can use your own judgement to unfollow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher S. Penn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:16:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Identifying and nuking Twitter spammers</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/04/identifying-and-nuking-twitter-spammers/#comment-8680029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great tool for finding spammers who have yet to be suspended by Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My question is, why doesn't twitter have a system in place to automatically unfollow any suspended accounts?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or, similarly, is there a tool like this to go through all of your followers and figure out if any of them have been suspended so that you can unfollow them to make room for new followers (if you've reached a twitter limit)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;love the blog!  thanks!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.twitter.com/nonpretentious" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.twitter.com/nonpretentious"&gt;www.twitter.com/nonpretentious&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nonpretentious</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Identifying and nuking Twitter spammers</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/04/identifying-and-nuking-twitter-spammers/#comment-8674078</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love the concept, but I take issue with the terms you chose as the marks of a spam tweet. I'm sure I have tweeted "Whew, just finished a long new blog post!" or something of the sort ... and there are perfectly legitimate people who share a blog post they wrote every once in awhile preceded by "New Blog Post:" Non-spammers could also tweet "Need some way to make more money" as a vent and not as a scam invitation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can definitely use this method to find people who might throw up red flags, but I'd refrain from doing it automatically, as then it would have automatically unfollowed you, according to Summize: &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/cttjsu" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/cttjsu"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/cttjsu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even a 100% spammy term like tweetergetter will probably come up in some tweets by people who say "I hate tweetergetter."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have you seen TweetSum? They're still working on the algorithm, but it ranks a user's past behavior against a "douchebag index" and the spammers move to the top. &lt;a href="http://www.tweetsum.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.tweetsum.com"&gt;http://www.tweetsum.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarinaMartin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:07:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Identifying and nuking Twitter spammers</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/04/identifying-and-nuking-twitter-spammers/#comment-8673663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Short of running some Yahoo Pipes from code other people wrote, I don't know the animal. Like Bob wrote, thanks for the detail! How does one write against the API? :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ari Herzog</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:39:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Identifying and nuking Twitter spammers</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/04/identifying-and-nuking-twitter-spammers/#comment-8671134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;a great tip with all the detail needed to make it work - thanks for sharing this!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BobGoyetche</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:12:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Identifying and nuking Twitter spammers</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2009/04/identifying-and-nuking-twitter-spammers/#comment-8670920</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent post.  I always here about your use of Yahoo Pipes on Marketing Over Coffee.  It is very exciting to see exactly how to make one.  Keep em coming!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:05:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>