<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Christopher S. Penn's Awaken Your Superhero - Latest Comments in Numbers redux</title><link>http://christopherspenn.disqus.com/</link><description>Christopher S. Penn's Awaken Your Superhero</description><atom:link href="https://christopherspenn.disqus.com/numbers_redux/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:47:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Numbers redux</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/04/numbers-redux/#comment-44585243</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i hope this post picks up with podcasters. this shit is so true, it's about time people stopped talking about audience numbers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">julien</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:47:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Numbers redux</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/04/numbers-redux/#comment-44585242</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree in principle about numbers and CPM discussion above (it is outdated model) but you still have to something to provide sponsors. They are used to having those traditional numbers, metrics, data points, etc... They want some thing that will justify their spent on promoting a show. It is up to us podcasters to figure out the story to convey.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pay for performance certainly makes the case for sponsorship dollars very clear. The hard part is finding a pay for performance model for your show.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john blue</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:11:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Numbers redux</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/04/numbers-redux/#comment-44585241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sidenote: It floors me that said unnamed podcast network is so stuck in old media ways, despite flaunting new directions and using a fairly new medium.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Baffling.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason @ Insomnia Radio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:16:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Numbers redux</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/04/numbers-redux/#comment-44585238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been using the Gulfstream Jet analogy in several sales oriented meetings lately. It's just a fantastic viewpoint.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Numbers truly don't (well, SHOULDN'T) matter anymore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great post, thank you...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason @ Insomnia Radio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:14:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Numbers redux</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/04/numbers-redux/#comment-44585236</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You hit the nail on the head. The value of the podcasting audience isn't in their numbers, it's in their response to your call to action. If the action you're suggesting fits with their individual need, why wouldn't they click on that link? And be happy that you provided it to them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;any other stat means almost to nothing in comparison.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vergel Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:57:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Numbers redux</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2007/04/numbers-redux/#comment-44585235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's smart. The only hard part is matching advertising with what your audience is engaged with.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave LaMorte</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>