DISQUS

Phillip · 2 years ago

Very interesting thoughts indeed. And late on a Saturday evening at that.

Adele McAlear · 2 years ago

As a Canadian, it is depressing to think that the destruction of the natural state of the north might reap economic benefits and squabbles over sovereignty. Sadly, the melting ice cap threatens the polar bear and many other species as well as the way of life of the (mostly indigenous) arctic peoples who have lived there for more than 4,000 years. Yes, increased shipping will bring economic benefits to the region and our country, but at what cost? Mind you, it would be worse if we suffered both the environmental consequences as well as economic losses due to International disputes.

For those who have never heard of Nunavut: it is a gorgeous, wild place of soaring mountains and it has a population density of just 1 person /70 kms (43.5 mi).

But just because Nunavut is remote doesn't make it primitive. Broadband Internet (via satellite) is being used to deliver interactive educational programs and conduct e-business; the White Stripes shot their most recent video there this past summer while on tour (yes, they played Iqaluit!); and in 2004, someone I knew was fired from her job at Nunavut Tourism, because her employer disapproved of her personal blog.

Technology has made Nunavut part of the global community. Now if only the globe would unite on the environment, we could keep the polar ice intact and the sovereignty dispute would become a moot point.

Daniele Rossi · 2 years ago

What's more sad is Canada is very lax with protecting our arctic borders. There seem to be some effort to fix that but I sure hope it's done on time. http://www.thestar.com/article/277429