<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Christopher S. Penn's Awaken Your Superhero - Latest Comments in Re-syncing Twitter</title><link>http://christopherspenn.disqus.com/</link><description>Christopher S. Penn's Awaken Your Superhero</description><atom:link href="https://christopherspenn.disqus.com/re_syncing_twitter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:06:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Re-syncing Twitter</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/06/re-syncing-twitter/#comment-2519689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Given how unreliable Twitter is, and how often it loses stuff, it's kind of a moot point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher S. Penn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:06:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Re-syncing Twitter</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2008/06/re-syncing-twitter/#comment-2519688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So everyone gets an equal voice, but the Twitterstream becomes useless to you.  So you don't offend anyone this way, but how does this approach help you, exactly?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sticking with my "Twitter-snob approach." I follow back some of my followers, but not all.  I want to stay away from a situation where the signal-to-noise ratio becomes nothing but noise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BryanPerson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:21:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>